Wednesday, 24 April 2013

Question 7 of Evaluation


1)      Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?
-          Our brief for the preliminary task was all about continuity. This involved “filming and editing a character opening a door, crossing a room and sitting down in a chair opposite another character, with whom she/he then exchanges a couple of lines of dialogue”. The task had to demonstrate exhibit match on action, 180-degree rule and shot/reverse shot.
-          This was quite a different task to our main one (the two minute opening). With our main task we had to film the opening of a new fiction film that was a maximum of two minutes long and it had to include titles.
-          When looking at these two tasks, there are definitely elements of match-on-action, shot/reverse shot and the 180-degree rule. Also, due to our preliminary exercise we were able to identify and use different shots in our two minute opening sequence. For example we used high angle shots, close ups, medium close up shots, long shots and many others. We used these different methods because of the many different aspects of filming we learnt about before, during and after our preliminary exercise.
-          I believe we have greatly improved since our preliminary exercise. For example, our match-on-action sequences are smoother and we used shot-reverse-shot slightly differently than in our preliminary exercise. 

Question 6 of Evaluation

Question 5 of Evaluation

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1pHJlbjyyus0KBxE_wfjyxWaQ21niGGzPD8YWHalFQJE/edit?usp=sharing

Question 4 of Evaluation

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1VF8bOnQXDQBv5o_hNp4s017gdXU0F19mqJMFOzgXEQc/edit?usp=sharing

Question 3 of Evaluation


Our film deals with some sensitive topics, like drug use and its effects, so that means that we may be slightly limited as to who would be willing to distribute our film. Despite this there are still a fair amount of mainstream and independent distributors who may be willing to distribute our film.
For example, in terms of independent distributors, Metrodome would be a good option. This is because they distributed the film Shifty. The synopsis: Shifty, a young crack cocaine dealer in London, sees his life quickly spiral out of control when his best friend returns home. Stalked by a customer desperate to score at all costs, and with his family about to turn their back on him for good, Shifty must out-run and out-smart a rival drug dealer, intent on setting him up for a big fall. As his long-time friend Chris confronts the dark past he left behind him, Shifty is forced to face up to the violent future he's hurtling towards” – by Anonymous on IMDB.
Our film also deals with the issue of drugs; in a different way to Shifty but nevertheless there are some similarities.
In terms of possible mainstream distributors, New Line Cinema may be a good option for our film. This is because they have released films such as “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” and “Se7en”. Though these films are very different from ours, they aren’t something that every film distributor would jump to release. This shows that New Line Cinema would be a good match as our film is something that pushes the boundaries (slightly; only because of the drug use and psychological aspects). 

Question 2 of Evaluation

Question 1 of Evaluation


1)      In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?

In the narrative we establish the plot before and after the title sequence which goes against some of the usual conventions where the plot may be established after a title sequence, like in North by Northwest directed by Alfred Hitchcock.
In our two minute opening sequence the plot is established with a significant event before the title sequence and then a complication afterwards – the passing out of the main character is the significant event while the death of the cousin is the complication.
Our film was designed to be linear but with events that would confuse the audience, as our film is a psychological thriller so it needs situations like this to be successful. Flash-backs may have added to the psychological confusion however, like in Shutter Island where Teddy Daniels experiences brief flashbacks to events before the time the main film is set.
With our camera angles, shot movement and positions of the camera we generally stayed with the norm, except in one shot where the camera is positioned far to the left of the character it should be focused on. This is something usually found in horror films, but they can and usually are incorporated into psychological thrillers to add a more tense atmosphere, as the space that is not occupied by another character could be invaded by something at any point, which in turn would cause the audience to jump. However we used it as a device to build the tension in the atmosphere which is something that is found often in the darker genres of film.  
With the continuity and editing, we did an okay job in terms of creating a smooth film – there weren’t many jumps in the final cut. The pacing and rhythm of our two minute opening was quite fast but it wasn’t choppy (at least not until the end, where for some reason our two minute opening didn’t render properly). 
In the background of our two minute opening, in the beginning, the diegetic sound of the opening of Cape Fear can be heard. We did this to try and subliminally translate to the audience that the film was a psychological thriller, like Cape Fear. It adds impact to the opening scene, which was something we wanted to achieve since our full film would have been designed to be fast paced. In the scenes before and after the title sequence, the sound heard is all diegetic. We did this to make the film seem more real in a way, to try and immerse the audience more. However, this could have been achieved more successfully through silence.
The ‘costumes’ used in the two minute film opening were all things that we owned ourselves. We were given different roles to play and we tried to show this through our clothing. The location was one of our group members’ houses, where most of the full film would have been set. This is not usual for a mainstream film – for it to be set in one specific location. Though, it is not completely unusual as films like 127 Hours and Harry Potter is (for the most part) set in one specific location.
The props used were all bought ourselves or they were things that we had on hand at the location.
The font used in the title sequence was bold and was a sans serif font. The size of the font was around 16, while the main title was around 36. We used an effect on Final Cut Express to add an effect to the font that would make it look more rough and distorted. 
In our two minute opening we didn’t have many pieces of iconography due to the fact that it’s difficult to do this with psychological thrillers at the beginning. Psychological thrillers are about building up the psychological aspects slowly, so we only got three pieces of iconography. One of these was the lighting – our film looked very dark and almost like it was shot in black and white even though it wasn’t (this can be linked to mise-en-scene too).
We also filmed a shot where there was a big amount of empty space next to one of the main characters. This is a typical convention seen in most horror and psychological thriller films as the empty space is supposed to make the audience wary of something that may or may not “jump in” or appear on screen.